Analysis of State Changes in English Causative Constructions: Insights from Construction Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24442Keywords:
Causative Constructions, Change-of-State, Construction Grammar, Cognitive ProcessesAbstract
This research aims to explore how English causative constructions convey changes in state, using the frameworks of Construction Grammar and Radical Construction Grammar. The 310 English language samples were selected based on their relevance to illustrating transitions caused by internal or external factors, sourced from reliable texts, diverse contexts, varied grammatical constructions, and common usage patterns. Through a thorough examination of syntax and semantics, the study aims to illustrate how causative constructions effectively capture dynamic processes and cognitive perceptions. Emphasis is placed on the roles of the agent and patient, with the analysis seeking to uncover how these structures deal with causality and, crucially, changes in state. The findings show that causative structures in English mainly depict physical changes, although there is still a significant representation of emotional and mental changes. This analysis reveals the universal and language-specific aspects of causative constructions and provides insights into how they are used in everyday conversations and cognitive activities.References
Abilkazievich, M. A., & Urazbaevna, K. Z. (2023). Syntactic-semantic realization of causative structures in English and Karakalpak languages. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 5(11), 29-37.
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2020). Experiencers and causation. In Perspectives on causation: Selected papers from the Jerusalem 2017 workshop (pp. 297-317). Springer International Publishing.
Boas, H.C., 2013. Cognitive construction grammar. In: T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.233-254.
Comrie, B. (1974). Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society, 73(1), 1-32. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Comrie, B. (1985). Causative Constructions and Universal Grammar. In B. Comrie & S. M. Polinsky (Eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (pp. 1-60). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Comrie, B. (1985). Causative constructions: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Croft, W., & Vigus, M. (2020). Event causation and force dynamics in argument structure constructions. In J. Persson & P. Ylikoski (Eds.), Perspectives on causation (pp. 151–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50824-6_7
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1-88). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Flach, S. (2021). From movement into action to manner of causation: Changes in argument mapping in the into-causative. Linguistics, 59(3), 595-625. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0269
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219-224.
Guerra, K. S. (2020). Contact-induced request softening in Northern Andean Spanish: Linguistic ideologies in perception and practice (Publication No. 27736271) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 56(2), 251-299.
Iwata, S. (2006). Argument resultatives and adjunct resultatives in a lexical constructional account: The case of resultatives with adjectival result phrases. Language Sciences, 28(5), 449-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.04.001
Jayeola, W. A. (2020). Antisymmetry and word order in double object constructions in Zarma. Linguistik online. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/6645/664573405007.pdf
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Le, N. B. (2024). Semantics of INTO in motion events and its Vietnamese equivalents. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24324
Le, N. B. (2024). The semantic analysis of TOWARDS from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(3), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24332
Ledgeway, A. (2021). Coming and going in Calabrian: The syntax of pseudo-coordination. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 66, 5-29. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.89365
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. MIT Press.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge University Press.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2021). Verb Meaning and the Construction of Event Structure. Oxford University Press.
Mangialavori Rasia, E., & Ausensi, J. (2020). Intransitive causatives in English: Productivity regularities and asymmetries. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2020.v24i2.885
Mbae, J. (2020). Kimeru causatives: A morphosyntactic study in a construction grammar approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi].
Middeke, K. (2021). Agent, topic, subject? The nominative. In The old English case system. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004435278/BP000009.xml
Mitrović, M. (2022). Syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of pseudo-coordination. In Pseudo-coordination and multiple agreement constructions (p. 287).
Nadathur, P., & Lauer, S. (2020). Causal necessity, causal sufficiency, and the implications of causative verbs. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.497
Nash, L. (2020). Causees are not agents. In Perspectives on causation: Selected papers from the Jerusalem 2017 workshop (pp. 349-394). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-34308-8_11
Shibatani, M. (1976). The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causative constructions (pp. 1-40). Academic Press.
Shibatani, M. (2002). The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation. John Benjamins Publishing.
Sigurðsson, E. F., & Wood, J. (2021). On the implicit argument of Icelandic indirect causatives. Linguistic Inquiry. https://direct.mit.edu/ling/article-abstract/52/3/579/97436
Skrobák, É. E. (2023). Conceptual metaphors as deception markers in spontaneous speech. New Horizons in English Studies, 22, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.17951/nh.2023.22-38
Song, J. J. (1996). Causatives and causation: A universal-typological perspective. Longman.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume I: Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tran Quang Hai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of TESOL & Education (ijte) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijte are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
