Self-Report and Student-Report Nonverbal Teacher Immediacy (NTI) in College EFL Speaking Classes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25541

Keywords:

nonverbal teacher immediacy, instructional communication, self-report nonverbal immediacy, observer-report nonverbal immediacy

Abstract

Teacher immediacy, or affinity-seeking tactics (both verbal and non-verbal) that teachers use to create a supportive and friendly learning environment for learners, is particularly relevant to EFL speaking classes with a focus on communication. This research looks into whether there is a discrepancy between how teachers and their students perceive nonverbal teacher immediacy behaviors in a Vietnamese higher-education context. Four teachers and 138 first-year EFL students from eight English-speaking skills classes at a Vietnamese college were recruited. Data analysis of students’ and teachers’ questionnaires and narrative analysis of teachers’ interviews highlight that although the two perspectives share some similarity regarding posture, eye contact, and smiling, more prominent disparities are present in other nonverbal behaviors. The research contributes to existing literature, as well as informs teachers, teacher educators, and other stakeholders about the importance of nonverbal teacher immediacy in EFL and broader contexts.

Author Biography

  • Pham Hoang Dan, Hanoi University of Industry, Hanoi, Vietnam

    MSc. Pham Hoang Dan is an instructor at English Language Faculty, School of Languages and Tourism (Hanoi University of Industry). Working mostly with college students on improving their language competency, Dan Pham’s main research interests include effective teacher-learner communication and innovative teaching methods.

References

Bıçkı, A. (2008). An observation of nonverbal immediacy behaviours of native and non-native lecturers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 1-20.

Borich, G.D. (1980). A needs assessment model for conducting follow-up studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 39-42.

Cai, M. (2021). The predictability of Chinese English as a foreign language students’ willingness to communicate through teachers’ immediacy and teacher–student rapport. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:769424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769424

Chiew-Goh, S. & Fraser, B.J. (1996). Validation of an elementary school version of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Psychological Reports, 79, 515–522. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.79.2.515

Comadena, M., Hunt, S., & Simonds, C. (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24, 241-248.

Dinh, T. T. D., & Ha, Y. N. (2024). Nonverbal Cues in Teaching Foreign Language for Vietnamese Higher Education Learners. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 5, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.24515

Estepp, C., Shelnutt, K. & Roberts, G. (2014). A comparison of student and professor perceptions of teacher immediacy behaviors in large agricultural classrooms. NACTA Journal, 58, 155-162.

Fernández-García, A., & Fonseca-Mora, M. (2019). EFL learners’ speaking proficiency and its connection to emotional understanding, willingness to communicate and musical experience. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819891868

Folwell, A. L. (2000). A comparison of professors' and students' perceptions of nonverbal immediacy behaviors. Journal of the Northwest Communication Association, 29, 33-41.

Frymier, A., Goldman, Z., & Claus, C. (2019). Why nonverbal immediacy matters: A motivation explanation. Communication Quarterly, 67, 526-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2019.1668442

Frymier, A.N. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students?. Communication Quarterly, 41, 454-464.

Gol, M., Zand-Moghadam, A., & Karrab, M. (2014). The construct of willingness to communicate and its relationship with EFL learners’ perceived verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(1), 135-160.

Hsu, L. (2010). The impact of perceived teachers' nonverbal immediacy on students' motivation for learning English. Asia EFL Journal, 12, 188-204.

Hsu, L., Watson, T., Lin, C., & Ho, T. (2007). Explorations in teachers’ nonverbal immediacy behaviors and students’ willingness to talk in English. English Teaching & Learning, 31(3), 1-27.

Jin, S. (2023). Speaking proficiency and affective effects in EFL: Vlogging as a social media-integrated activity. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 586-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13381

Le, X. M., & Le, T. T. (2022). Factors Affecting Students’ Attitudes towards Learning English as a Foreign Language in a Tertiary Institution of Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22229

Lee, J. (2020). Relationships among students’ perceptions of native and non-native EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviours and credibility and students’ willingness to communicate in class. Oxford Review of Education, 46, 153 - 168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1642187.

Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2025). Do we need to beware of students’ perceptions?: immediacy and emotional relationship between students and teachers in the Asian context. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 102, 87-102. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.101436

McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). A cross‐cultural and multi‐behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379019

Mehrabian, A. (1968). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1(6), 203-207.

Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication or emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Mullane, R.R. (2014). Student's perception of teacher immediacy behaviors on student success and retention [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee]. UWM Digital Commons.

Nussbaum, J.F. (1984). The Montana program to systematically modify teacher communicative behavior. The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Ozmen, K.S. (2011). Perception of nonverbal immediacy and effective teaching among student teachers: A study across cultural extremes. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 865-881.

Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2022). Employing e-tandem language learning method to enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: The case of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37, 924-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2064512.

Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J.C. (2004). Nonverbal Behaviors in Interpersonal Relations (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.

Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., & Hickson, M.L. (2012). Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Roberts, T.G., Conner, N.W., Estepp, C.M., Giorgi, A., & Stripling, C.T. (2012). Examining the teaching behaviors of successful teachers in a college of agricultural and life sciences. NACTA Journal, 56(2), 21-28.

Sheybani, M. (2019). The relationship between EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: A structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychology, 6(1): 1607051. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1607051

Smythe, M., & Hess, J. (2005). Are student self-reports a valid method for measuring teacher nonverbal immediacy?. Communication Education, 54(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500213389

Tran, A. & Luu, G. (2018). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-economic Dynamics, 6(13), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.6(13).2018.54-63

Wang, Y., & Hu, L. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychology, 11, 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x

Witt, P., & Wheeless, L. (2001). An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342.

Yuan, L. (2024). EFL teacher-student interaction, teacher immediacy, and Students' academic engagement in the Chinese higher learning context. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104185

Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. (2006). Constructing and Validating a Teacher Immediacy Scale: A Chinese Perspective. Communication Education, 55, 218-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600566231

Downloads

Published

20-10-2025

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Pham, H. D. (2025). Self-Report and Student-Report Nonverbal Teacher Immediacy (NTI) in College EFL Speaking Classes. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25541

Similar Articles

1-10 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.