Navigating the AI Turn: Framework for Responsible AI Integration in Language Education
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) revolutionizes the teaching and learning of language, the discipline faces two challenges: to avoid the traps of superficial technological replacement and to proactively defend academic integrity and learner autonomy. This paper addresses this conflict by asking two important questions: (1) pedagogical conditions that favor the development of profound language skills in AI rather than superficial language skills; (2) organizations can promote responsible use while cultivating critical thinking. To address these questions, this paper proposes the Framework for Responsible AI Integration in Language Education (FRAILE). This unifying model incorporates recent empirical research to offer a comprehensive structural response to the AI disruption. This presentation introduces a new AI Task Typology to enable cognitive engagement within the FRAILE.
References
Asadi, M., Ebadi, S., & Mohammadi, L. (2025). The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers' feedback on EFL writing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766
Babanoğlu, M. P., Öztürk Karataş, T., & Dündar, E. (2025). Envisioning the future of AI-assisted EFL teaching and learning: Conceptual representations of prospective teachers. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251341590
Bahari, A., & Liu, Y. (2025). AI integration in EFL teacher development: a mixed-methods evaluation of digital competency, professional trajectories, and pedagogical innovation within adaptive learning ecosystems. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2591251
Bao, W., Wang, T., Zhang, L., Yusop, F. D., & Ruan, X. (2025). A systematic review of AI in second language acquisition using the expanded SAMR model (2015–2024). Discover Computing, 28(1), 292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09833-6
Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964
Digital Education Council. (2024, August 7). What students want: Key results from DEC global AI student survey 2024. Digital Education Council. Retrieved from
Du, C., Peng, Y., binti Ahmad, N. K., & binti Jamil, A. H. (2025). EFL teachers' identity tensions and transformation in AI-driven teaching in China: A dialogical approach. In V. P. H. Pham et al. (Eds.), Empowering educators: Integrating AI tools for personalized language instruction. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01348-4_7
Duc, D. H. (2026). Operationalizing SAMR Redefinition in EFL reading: AI as a mediating tool for literacy innovation. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 5(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v5i1.1900
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hariyanto, Kristianingsih, F.X.D. & Maharani, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in adaptive education: a systematic review of techniques for personalized learning. Discover Education, 4, 458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00908-6
Hou, C., Zhu, G., & Sudarshan, V. (2025). The role of critical thinking on undergraduates' reliance behaviours on generative AI in problem-solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1919–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13613
Hsu, H.-P. (2025). An autoethnographic study of ESL academic writing with ChatGPT: From psychological insights to the SUPER framework. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2543113. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2543113
Khan, R., Qamar, M. T., Ansari, M. S., & Yasmeen, J. (2025). Enhancing or impairing? Exploring Indian EFL learners' academic writing narratives with ChatGPT. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2514329. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2514329
Lee, S., Choe, H., Zou, D., & Jeon, J. (2025). Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(1), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2498537
Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445
Liu, J., Sihes, A. J. B., & Lu, Y. (2025). How do generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and large language models (LLMs) influence language learners' critical thinking in EFL education? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00406-0
Lo, C.K., Yu, P.L.H., Xu, S. et al. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025). Redesigning assessments for AI-enhanced learning: A framework for educators in the generative AI era. Education Sciences, 15(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020174
Nazim, M., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2025). Empowering EFL teachers' perceptions of generative AI-mediated self-professionalism. PLOS ONE, 20(6), e0326735. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326735
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Nguyen, L. N. A., & Pham, T. D. (2025). Integrating AI tools in IELTS writing: A case study from teachers' perspectives on personalized instruction. In V. P. H. Pham et al. (Eds.), Empowering educators: Integrating AI tools for personalized language instruction. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01348-4_4
Pan, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). From technology-challenged teachers to empowered digitalized citizens: Exploring the profiles and antecedents of teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e70020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70020
Pham, V. P. H., & Huynh, Q. Q. (2025). Employing AI tools for vocabulary acquisition and autonomous learning. In V. P. H. Pham et al. (Eds.), Empowering educators: Integrating AI tools for personalized language instruction. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01348-4_10
Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students' writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Hippasus. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Reuters. (2023) ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note. Reuters. Retrieved on 16 April 2026 from https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391104
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Yao, L., & Seedhouse, P. (2025). A scoping review of empirical studies on generative artificial intelligence in language education. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2509759
Werdiningsih, I., Marzuki, & Rusdin, D. (2024). Balancing AI and authenticity: EFL students' experiences with ChatGPT in academic writing. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2392388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2392388
Ilma, A., & Rohmah, Z. (2025). AI in EFL education: teachers’ competence and the roadblocks to teaching material development. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2588471. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2588471
Xiao, F., Zhu, S., & Xin, W. (2025). Exploring the landscape of generative AI (ChatGPT)-powered writing instruction in English as a foreign language education: A scoping review. ECNU Review of Education, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241310881
Yuan, L., & Liu, X. (2025). The effect of artificial intelligence tools on EFL learners' engagement, enjoyment, and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, Article 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108474
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of TESOL & Education (ijte) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijte are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.









